gambler: blame others

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.49
, addiction
Weight: 0.48
, risk
Weight: 0.46
, character
Weight: 0.46
, person
Weight: 0.45
Siblings gambling
Weight: 0.32
, drug addict
Weight: 0.31
, one person
Weight: 0.30
, guy
Weight: 0.30
, homeless person
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
blame others 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(gambler, blame others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(drug addict, blame others)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(gambler, blame others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(drug addict, blame others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(drug addict, blame others)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(gambler, blame others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(gambler, blame others)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(gambler, blame others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(gambler, blame others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(gambler, blame others)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(gambler, blame others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(gambler, blame others)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(gambler, blame others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drug addict, blame others)