gambling: be fun to sodapoppin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, addiction
Weight: 0.61
, habit
Weight: 0.61
, diversion
Weight: 0.59
Siblings betting
Weight: 0.35
, poker
Weight: 0.35
, pornography
Weight: 0.34
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be fun to sodapoppin 1.00
has trait fun 0.85
is entertaining 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be fun to sodapoppin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(poker, has trait fun)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(gambling, be fun to sodapoppin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(poker, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(poker, has trait fun)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(gambling, be fun to sodapoppin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(gambling, be fun to sodapoppin)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(gambling, be fun to sodapoppin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gambling, has trait fun)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(gambling, be fun to sodapoppin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(gambling, has trait fun)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(gambling, be fun to sodapoppin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(gambling, has trait fun)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gambling, be fun to sodapoppin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has trait fun)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(gambling, be fun to sodapoppin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(gambling, be fun to sodapoppin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be fun to sodapoppin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(gambling, be fun to sodapoppin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(gambling, be fun to sodapoppin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be fun to sodapoppin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(poker, has trait fun)