gambling: be on rivers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, addiction
Weight: 0.61
, habit
Weight: 0.61
, diversion
Weight: 0.59
Siblings betting
Weight: 0.35
, poker
Weight: 0.35
, pornography
Weight: 0.34
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on rivers 1.00
effect river 0.83
is creek 0.81
affect groundwater water in watershed 0.81
be in waters 0.78
affect river process through afforestation 0.77
affect wetlands 0.76
be in international waters 0.76
affect groundwater 0.76
affect waterfalls 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(activity, effect river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(gambling, be on rivers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(activity, affect groundwater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(gambling, be on rivers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(activity, affect groundwater water in watershed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(gambling, be on rivers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(activity, affect groundwater water in watershed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(activity, affect groundwater)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(activity, effect river)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect groundwater water in watershed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(activity, effect river)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect groundwater)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(activity, effect river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(gambling, be on rivers)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(activity, affect groundwater water in watershed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(gambling, be on rivers)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(activity, affect groundwater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(gambling, be on rivers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(gambling, be on rivers)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(gambling, is creek)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(gambling, is creek)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is creek)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(gambling, is creek)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be on rivers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(gambling, be on rivers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(activity, affect groundwater water in watershed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(activity, effect river)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(activity, affect groundwater)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(activity, affect groundwater water in watershed)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(activity, affect groundwater)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(gambling, be on rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(activity, effect river)