gambling: has state addiction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, addiction
Weight: 0.61
, habit
Weight: 0.61
, diversion
Weight: 0.59
Siblings betting
Weight: 0.35
, poker
Weight: 0.35
, pornography
Weight: 0.34
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state addiction 1.00
is addictive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(poker, is addictive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(betting, is addictive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pornography, is addictive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pornography, is addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pornography, is addictive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(betting, is addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(betting, is addictive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(poker, is addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(poker, is addictive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(gambling, has state addiction)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(gambling, is addictive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is addictive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(gambling, is addictive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(gambling, is addictive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has state addiction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(gambling, has state addiction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pornography, is addictive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(poker, is addictive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(betting, is addictive)