gambling: similar to actions of minors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, addiction
Weight: 0.61
, habit
Weight: 0.61
, diversion
Weight: 0.59
Siblings betting
Weight: 0.35
, poker
Weight: 0.35
, pornography
Weight: 0.34
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
similar to actions of minors 1.00
similar to actions 0.84
influence people 's sexual actions 0.78
influence people 's actions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gambling, similar to actions of minors) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(pornography, influence people 's sexual actions)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gambling, similar to actions of minors) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(pornography, influence people 's actions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(gambling, similar to actions of minors) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(pornography, influence people 's sexual actions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(pornography, influence people 's sexual actions)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(gambling, similar to actions of minors) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(pornography, influence people 's actions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(pornography, influence people 's actions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(gambling, similar to actions of minors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(gambling, similar to actions of minors)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(gambling, similar to actions of minors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(gambling, similar to actions)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(gambling, similar to actions of minors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(gambling, similar to actions)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(gambling, similar to actions of minors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(gambling, similar to actions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(gambling, similar to actions of minors) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(gambling, similar to actions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(gambling, similar to actions of minors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(gambling, similar to actions of minors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gambling, similar to actions of minors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(gambling, similar to actions of minors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(gambling, similar to actions of minors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gambling, similar to actions of minors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(pornography, influence people 's sexual actions)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gambling, similar to actions of minors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(pornography, influence people 's actions)