gambling: was outlawed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, addiction
Weight: 0.61
, habit
Weight: 0.61
, diversion
Weight: 0.59
Siblings betting
Weight: 0.35
, poker
Weight: 0.35
, pornography
Weight: 0.34
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was outlawed 1.00
is banned 0.85
was legalized 0.81
is illegal 0.76
be illegal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(poker, is illegal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(poker, be illegal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(betting, is illegal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(betting, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(betting, is illegal)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(poker, be illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(poker, be illegal)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(poker, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(poker, is illegal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(gambling, was outlawed)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(gambling, is banned)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gambling, was legalized)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is illegal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(gambling, is banned)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(gambling, is banned)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(gambling, is illegal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(gambling, was legalized)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(gambling, was legalized)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gambling, is illegal)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(gambling, is illegal)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is banned)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(gambling, was legalized)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(gambling, was outlawed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(gambling, was outlawed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(poker, be illegal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(poker, is illegal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(gambling, was outlawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(betting, is illegal)