gamma radiation: have greatest penetrating power

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents radiation
Weight: 0.77
, parameter
Weight: 0.65
, treatment
Weight: 0.59
, method
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.54
Siblings alpha radiation
Weight: 0.41
, gamma
Weight: 0.35
, beta radiation
Weight: 0.35
, beta particle
Weight: 0.34
, wavelength
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have greatest penetrating power 1.00
have penetrating power 0.93
have greatest power 0.88
is most penetrating 0.88
is penetrating 0.86
have power 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(gamma, is most penetrating)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gamma, is penetrating)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(alpha radiation, have power)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alpha radiation, is penetrating)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(alpha radiation, have penetrating power)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(alpha radiation, have penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(alpha radiation, have penetrating power)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(alpha radiation, is penetrating)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(alpha radiation, is penetrating)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(alpha radiation, have power)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(alpha radiation, have power)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(gamma, is penetrating)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gamma, is penetrating)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(gamma, is most penetrating)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(gamma, is most penetrating)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(gamma radiation, have penetrating power)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(gamma radiation, have penetrating power)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest power)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(gamma radiation, have penetrating power)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(gamma radiation, have greatest power)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(gamma radiation, is penetrating)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(gamma radiation, have power)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(gamma radiation, have power)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(gamma radiation, have greatest power)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(gamma radiation, have power)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gamma radiation, is most penetrating)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, is most penetrating)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(gamma radiation, have greatest power)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(gamma radiation, is penetrating)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, have power)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, is penetrating)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, have penetrating power)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(gamma radiation, is most penetrating)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(gamma radiation, is penetrating)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(gamma radiation, is most penetrating)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(alpha radiation, have penetrating power)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(alpha radiation, have power)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(gamma, is penetrating)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(gamma, is most penetrating)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, have greatest penetrating power)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(alpha radiation, is penetrating)