gap: be in employment matter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents store
Weight: 0.59
, distance
Weight: 0.59
, part
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings communication
Weight: 0.61
, third
Weight: 0.53
, sill
Weight: 0.39
, gulf
Weight: 0.31
, hole
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in employment matter 1.00
be bad in employment 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(gap, be in employment matter)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(gap, be in employment matter)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(gap, be in employment matter)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(gap, be bad in employment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(gap, be in employment matter)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gap, be bad in employment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(gap, be in employment matter)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(gap, be bad in employment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(gap, be in employment matter)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(gap, be bad in employment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(gap, be in employment matter)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gap, be in employment matter)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(gap, be in employment matter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(gap, be in employment matter)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gap, be in employment matter)