gap: be in teeth bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents store
Weight: 0.59
, distance
Weight: 0.59
, part
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings communication
Weight: 0.61
, third
Weight: 0.53
, sill
Weight: 0.39
, gulf
Weight: 0.31
, hole
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in teeth bad 1.00
be in teeth 0.96
form in teeth 0.91
form between teeth 0.87
be attractive in teeth 0.87
appear between teeth 0.87
occur between teeth 0.85
has physical part tooth 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(gap, be in teeth bad)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(gap, be in teeth)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(gap, be in teeth)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(gap, be in teeth)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(gap, appear between teeth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(gap, form in teeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(gap, form in teeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(gap, form in teeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(gap, form between teeth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(gap, form between teeth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(gap, occur between teeth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(gap, form between teeth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(gap, appear between teeth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(gap, form in teeth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(gap, form between teeth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(gap, be attractive in teeth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(gap, be in teeth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(gap, has physical part tooth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(gap, be attractive in teeth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(gap, appear between teeth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(gap, be attractive in teeth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(gap, occur between teeth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(gap, has physical part tooth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(gap, has physical part tooth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(gap, occur between teeth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(gap, be attractive in teeth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(gap, has physical part tooth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(gap, appear between teeth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(gap, occur between teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gap, be in teeth bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(gap, be in teeth bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gap, be in teeth bad)