garbage: be at toronto

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents waste
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, mess
Weight: 0.58
Siblings human waste
Weight: 0.66
, banana peel
Weight: 0.58
, litter
Weight: 0.56
, trash
Weight: 0.36
, trash container
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at toronto 1.00
be at rome 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be at toronto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at rome)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(garbage, be at toronto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(trash, be at rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(trash, be at rome)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(garbage, be at toronto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(garbage, be at toronto)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(garbage, be at toronto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(garbage, be at toronto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be at toronto)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(garbage, be at toronto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(garbage, be at toronto)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be at toronto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(trash, be at rome)