garbage: be ugly and smelly

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents waste
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, mess
Weight: 0.58
Siblings human waste
Weight: 0.66
, banana peel
Weight: 0.58
, litter
Weight: 0.56
, trash
Weight: 0.36
, trash container
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be ugly and smelly 1.00
be smelly 0.94
smell nasty 0.85
has unpleasant smell 0.82
smell horrible 0.80
smell bad 0.79
smell terrible 0.79
stink 0.78
be consider dirty 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(waste, stink)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(garbage, be ugly and smelly)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(waste, stink)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(waste, stink)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(trash, be smelly)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(trash, be consider dirty)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(trash container, has unpleasant smell)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(trash, stink)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(waste, stink)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(garbage, be ugly and smelly)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(trash, be smelly)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(trash, be smelly)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(trash container, has unpleasant smell)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(trash container, has unpleasant smell)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(trash, stink)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(trash, stink)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(trash, be consider dirty)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(trash, be consider dirty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(garbage, be ugly and smelly)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(garbage, smell nasty)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(garbage, smell nasty)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(garbage, smell nasty)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(garbage, smell horrible)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(garbage, smell horrible)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(garbage, smell bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(garbage, smell bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(garbage, smell terrible)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(garbage, smell terrible)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(garbage, smell horrible)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(garbage, smell terrible)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(garbage, smell bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(garbage, smell nasty)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(garbage, smell bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(garbage, smell horrible)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(garbage, smell terrible)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be ugly and smelly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(garbage, be ugly and smelly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(waste, stink)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(trash, be smelly)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(trash, stink)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(trash container, has unpleasant smell)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(trash, be consider dirty)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(garbage, be ugly and smelly)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(waste, stink)