garbage: rot chemical change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents waste
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, mess
Weight: 0.58
Siblings human waste
Weight: 0.66
, banana peel
Weight: 0.58
, litter
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
rot chemical change 1.00
rot change 0.93
is chemical change 0.85
is chemical 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(garbage, rot chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(garbage, rot chemical change)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(garbage, rot chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(garbage, rot change)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(garbage, rot chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(garbage, rot change)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(garbage, rot chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(garbage, rot change)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(garbage, rot chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(garbage, is chemical change)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(garbage, rot chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(garbage, is chemical change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(garbage, rot chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(garbage, is chemical)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(garbage, rot chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garbage, is chemical change)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(garbage, rot chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(garbage, is chemical change)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(garbage, rot chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(garbage, is chemical)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(garbage, rot chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(garbage, rot change)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(garbage, rot chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(garbage, is chemical)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(garbage, rot chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(garbage, is chemical)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(garbage, rot chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(garbage, rot chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(garbage, rot chemical change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(garbage, rot chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(garbage, rot chemical change)