garnet: is good abrasive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mineral
Weight: 0.70
, gem
Weight: 0.68
, stone
Weight: 0.65
, color
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.47
Siblings tourmaline
Weight: 0.36
, quartz
Weight: 0.36
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.36
, ruby
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good abrasive 1.00
is abrasive 0.98
be used as abrasive 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(garnet, is good abrasive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be used as abrasive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(garnet, is good abrasive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(quartz, be used as abrasive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(quartz, be used as abrasive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(garnet, is good abrasive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(garnet, is good abrasive)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(garnet, is good abrasive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(garnet, be used as abrasive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(garnet, is good abrasive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(garnet, is abrasive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(garnet, is good abrasive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(garnet, is abrasive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(garnet, is good abrasive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(garnet, is abrasive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(garnet, is good abrasive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(garnet, be used as abrasive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(garnet, is good abrasive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(garnet, is abrasive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(garnet, is good abrasive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(garnet, be used as abrasive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(garnet, is good abrasive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(garnet, be used as abrasive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(garnet, is good abrasive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(garnet, is good abrasive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(garnet, is good abrasive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(garnet, is good abrasive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(garnet, is good abrasive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(garnet, is good abrasive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(quartz, be used as abrasive)