gazelle: has physical part horns

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prey
Weight: 0.59
, antelope
Weight: 0.58
, animal
Weight: 0.57
, species
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cheetah
Weight: 0.36
, rhino
Weight: 0.35
, zebra
Weight: 0.35
, hare
Weight: 0.35
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part horns 1.00
has physical part legs 0.78
have twisty horns 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(antelope, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(gazelle, has physical part horns)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(antelope, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(gazelle, has physical part horns)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(antelope, has physical part horns)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(antelope, has physical part legs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(antelope, has physical part horns)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(antelope, has physical part legs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(rhino, has physical part horns)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, has physical part legs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(antelope, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(gazelle, has physical part horns)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(antelope, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(gazelle, has physical part horns)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(rhino, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(rhino, has physical part horns)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(cheetah, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cheetah, has physical part legs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(gazelle, has physical part horns)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(gazelle, has physical part legs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(gazelle, has physical part legs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, has physical part legs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(gazelle, has physical part legs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(gazelle, have twisty horns)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gazelle, have twisty horns)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(gazelle, have twisty horns)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, have twisty horns)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, has physical part horns)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(gazelle, has physical part horns)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(antelope, has physical part horns)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(antelope, has physical part legs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rhino, has physical part horns)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cheetah, has physical part legs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(antelope, has physical part horns)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(gazelle, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(antelope, has physical part legs)