gem: be different from regular minerals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings opal
Weight: 0.72
, ruby
Weight: 0.69
, garnet
Weight: 0.68
, aquamarine
Weight: 0.65
, sapphire
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from regular minerals 1.00
be different from minerals 0.95
is minerals 0.89
be more valuable than minerals 0.87
be much more valuable than other minerals 0.86
be much more valuable than minerals 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(gem, be different from regular minerals)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(gem, be different from minerals)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(gem, is minerals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(gem, is minerals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(gem, be different from minerals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(gem, be different from minerals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(gem, is minerals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(gem, be more valuable than minerals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(gem, be much more valuable than minerals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(gem, be different from minerals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(gem, be more valuable than minerals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(gem, be much more valuable than minerals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(gem, be more valuable than minerals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(gem, be much more valuable than other minerals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(gem, be much more valuable than minerals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(gem, be much more valuable than other minerals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(gem, be much more valuable than other minerals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than minerals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(gem, is minerals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(gem, be much more valuable than other minerals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gem, be much more valuable than minerals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gem, be different from regular minerals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gem, be different from regular minerals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(gem, be different from regular minerals)