gem: be more valuable than rock

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings opal
Weight: 0.72
, ruby
Weight: 0.69
, garnet
Weight: 0.68
, aquamarine
Weight: 0.65
, sapphire
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more valuable than rock 1.00
be much more valuable than other minerals 0.87
be much more valuable than minerals 0.86
be more valuable than minerals 0.85
be valuable 0.83
is valuable 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(opal, is valuable)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ruby, is valuable)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aquamarine, is valuable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(garnet, is valuable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(sapphire, is valuable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(sapphire, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sapphire, is valuable)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(garnet, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(garnet, is valuable)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(aquamarine, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(aquamarine, is valuable)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(opal, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(opal, is valuable)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ruby, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ruby, is valuable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(gem, be more valuable than rock)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(gem, be much more valuable than minerals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(gem, be more valuable than minerals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(gem, be much more valuable than other minerals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(gem, be much more valuable than minerals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(gem, be more valuable than minerals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(gem, be valuable)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(gem, be much more valuable than other minerals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(gem, is valuable)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(gem, be valuable)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(gem, be much more valuable than minerals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(gem, be more valuable than minerals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gem, is valuable)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(gem, be much more valuable than other minerals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(gem, be much more valuable than other minerals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(gem, is valuable)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(gem, be valuable)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gem, be much more valuable than minerals)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than minerals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(gem, be valuable)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(gem, is valuable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than rock)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(gem, be more valuable than rock)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(garnet, is valuable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sapphire, is valuable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(aquamarine, is valuable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(opal, is valuable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gem, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ruby, is valuable)