gender: be barrier to communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents determinant
Weight: 0.64
, trait
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sex
Weight: 0.34
, inequality
Weight: 0.33
, factor
Weight: 0.33
, geography
Weight: 0.33
, color
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be barrier to communication 1.00
be to communication 0.84
affect communication 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(gender, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(gender, be barrier to communication)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(gender, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(gender, affect communication)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(gender, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(gender, affect communication)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(gender, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gender, be to communication)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(gender, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(gender, affect communication)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(gender, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(gender, be to communication)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(gender, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(gender, be to communication)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(gender, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gender, be to communication)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(gender, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gender, affect communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(gender, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(gender, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(gender, be barrier to communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(gender, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(gender, be barrier to communication)