generation: be called x y z

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents application
Weight: 0.59
, opportunity
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, example
Weight: 0.57
Siblings boomer
Weight: 0.57
, gen
Weight: 0.49
, model
Weight: 0.32
, platform
Weight: 0.32
, phase
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called x y z 1.00
is y going 0.86
is x called 0.85
is y horrible 0.82
is y unhappy 0.81
is x small 0.80
be z against neutrality 0.79
is x expensive 0.79
be x bad with money 0.76
be z against net neutrality 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gen, is y horrible)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(gen, is y horrible)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(gen, is y horrible)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(generation, be called x y z)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(generation, is y going)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(generation, is x small)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(generation, is x small)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(generation, is x small)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(generation, is y going)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(generation, is y unhappy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(generation, is y going)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(generation, be x bad with money)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(generation, be x bad with money)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(generation, is y going)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(generation, be x bad with money)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(generation, be z against neutrality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(generation, be z against net neutrality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(generation, is y unhappy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(generation, is x called)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(generation, is x called)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(generation, be z against neutrality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(generation, is x small)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(generation, is x called)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(generation, be z against net neutrality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(generation, be x bad with money)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(generation, is y unhappy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(generation, be z against neutrality)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(generation, be z against net neutrality)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(generation, is x called)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(generation, is y unhappy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(generation, be z against neutrality)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(generation, be z against net neutrality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(generation, be called x y z)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(generation, be called x y z)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(generation, be called x y z)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(gen, is y horrible)