generation: is computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents application
Weight: 0.59
, opportunity
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, example
Weight: 0.57
Siblings boomer
Weight: 0.57
, gen
Weight: 0.49
, model
Weight: 0.32
, platform
Weight: 0.32
, phase
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is computer 1.00
have software 0.78
have important software 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(application, have important software)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(generation, is computer)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(application, have software)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(generation, is computer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(generation, is computer)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(application, have software)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(generation, is computer)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(application, have important software)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(generation, is computer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(application, have software)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(generation, is computer)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(application, have important software)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(application, have software)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(generation, is computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(generation, is computer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(application, have important software)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(generation, is computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(generation, is computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(generation, is computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(generation, is computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(generation, is computer)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(generation, is computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(generation, is computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(generation, is computer)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(generation, is computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(generation, is computer)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(application, have software)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(generation, is computer)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(application, have important software)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(generation, is computer)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(application, have software)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(generation, is computer)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(application, have important software)