generation: work progress

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents application
Weight: 0.59
, opportunity
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, example
Weight: 0.57
Siblings boomer
Weight: 0.57
, gen
Weight: 0.49
, model
Weight: 0.32
, platform
Weight: 0.32
, phase
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
work progress 1.00
has influenced progress 0.85
has influenced human progress 0.83
work 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(generation, work progress)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(application, has influenced progress)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(generation, work progress)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(application, has influenced human progress)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(generation, work progress)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(application, work)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(generation, work progress)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(application, has influenced progress)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(application, has influenced human progress)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(application, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(application, has influenced progress)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(application, has influenced human progress)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(application, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(phase, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(generation, work progress)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(application, has influenced progress)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(generation, work progress)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(application, has influenced human progress)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(generation, work progress)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(application, work)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(generation, work progress)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(phase, work)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(phase, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(generation, work progress)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(generation, work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(generation, work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(generation, work)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(generation, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(generation, work progress)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(generation, work progress)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(application, has influenced progress)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(application, has influenced human progress)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(application, work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(phase, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(application, has influenced progress)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(application, has influenced human progress)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(application, work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(generation, work progress)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)