geography: be considered science studies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, subject
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, culture
Weight: 0.63
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, mathematics
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.34
, biology
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered science studies 1.00
have science studies 0.98
be related to studies 0.91
be important part of studies 0.90
be related to social studies 0.88
be important part of social studies 0.88
is scientific study 0.87
is study 0.82
be important in study 0.81
be important to study 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(biology, is study)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(geography, be considered science studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(biology, is study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(biology, is study)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(geography, be considered science studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(geography, be considered science studies)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(geography, be considered science studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(geography, be related to social studies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(geography, be considered science studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(geography, be related to social studies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(geography, be considered science studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(geography, be related to social studies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(geography, be considered science studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(geography, be important to study)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(geography, be considered science studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(geography, be important to study)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(geography, be considered science studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(geography, be important to study)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(geography, be considered science studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to social studies)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(geography, be considered science studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(geography, be important to study)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(geography, be considered science studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(geography, be considered science studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science studies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(geography, be considered science studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(geography, be considered science studies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science studies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(biology, is study)