geometry: be important in art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.62
, discipline
Weight: 0.60
, course
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cylinder
Weight: 0.54
, chamfer
Weight: 0.46
, ellipsoid
Weight: 0.43
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in art 1.00
were important in art 0.97
be used in art 0.94
were important in muslim art 0.81
be used in islamic art 0.79
be used in photography 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(geometry, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be used in art)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(geometry, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be used in art)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be used in art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(geometry, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(geometry, be important in art)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(geometry, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(geometry, be used in art)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(geometry, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(geometry, were important in art)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(geometry, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(geometry, be used in art)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(geometry, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(geometry, be used in art)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(geometry, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(geometry, were important in art)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(geometry, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(geometry, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(geometry, be important in art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(geometry, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(geometry, be important in art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(geometry, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(mathematics, be used in art)