geometry: was developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.62
, discipline
Weight: 0.60
, course
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cylinder
Weight: 0.54
, chamfer
Weight: 0.46
, ellipsoid
Weight: 0.43
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was developed 1.00
be developed historically 0.82
was discovered 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(geometry, was developed)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(geometry, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(geometry, was developed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(geometry, be developed historically)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(geometry, was developed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(geometry, be developed historically)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(geometry, was developed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(geometry, was discovered)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(geometry, was developed)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(geometry, was discovered)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(geometry, was developed)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(geometry, be developed historically)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(geometry, was developed)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(geometry, be developed historically)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(geometry, was developed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(geometry, was discovered)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(geometry, was developed)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(geometry, was discovered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(geometry, was developed)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(geometry, was developed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(geometry, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(geometry, was developed)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(geometry, was developed)