georgia: have less earthquakes than california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alabama
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.62
, florida
Weight: 0.62
, republic
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tennessee
Weight: 0.36
, california
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, kentucky
Weight: 0.35
, mississippi
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have less earthquakes than california 1.00
have earthquakes 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(florida, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(alabama, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(florida, have less earthquakes than california)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(alabama, have earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(alabama, have earthquakes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(florida, have less earthquakes than california)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(california, have earthquakes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(florida, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(alabama, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(california, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(california, have earthquakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(georgia, have earthquakes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(georgia, have earthquakes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(georgia, have earthquakes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(georgia, have earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(alabama, have earthquakes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(florida, have less earthquakes than california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(california, have earthquakes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(florida, have less earthquakes than california)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(alabama, have earthquakes)