getting: be chemical change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.47
, revenge
Weight: 0.39
, time
Weight: 0.38
, challenge
Weight: 0.37
, problem
Weight: 0.37
Siblings get
Weight: 0.31
, giving
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31
, talking
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be chemical change 1.00
is physical change 0.78
has quality change 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(getting, be chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(getting, be chemical change)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(getting, be chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(getting, is physical change)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(getting, be chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(getting, is physical change)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(getting, be chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(getting, is physical change)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(getting, be chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality change)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(getting, be chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(getting, is physical change)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(getting, be chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(getting, has quality change)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(getting, be chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(getting, has quality change)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(getting, be chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(getting, has quality change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(getting, be chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(getting, be chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(getting, be chemical change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(getting, be chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(getting, be chemical change)