giant panda: is are killed by humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, endangered species
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.62
, bear
Weight: 0.60
Siblings red panda
Weight: 0.80
, panda
Weight: 0.40
, panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, orangutan
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is are killed by humans 1.00
being are killed 0.91
is killed 0.85
get killed 0.83
is are hunted for 0.79
being are hunted 0.78
be are hurt 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(red panda, get killed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(panda, get killed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(red panda, get killed)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red panda, get killed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(panda, get killed)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(panda, get killed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(giant panda, is are killed by humans)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, being are killed)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(giant panda, being are killed)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(giant panda, being are killed)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is killed)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(giant panda, is killed)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(giant panda, is killed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, get killed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(giant panda, get killed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(giant panda, get killed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(giant panda, being are killed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(giant panda, being are hunted)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(giant panda, is killed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(giant panda, being are hunted)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, being are hunted)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is are hunted for)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(giant panda, is are hunted for)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(giant panda, is are hunted for)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(giant panda, get killed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(giant panda, being are hunted)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be are hurt)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(giant panda, be are hurt)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(giant panda, is are hunted for)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be are hurt)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(giant panda, be are hurt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is are killed by humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(giant panda, is are killed by humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(red panda, get killed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is are killed by humans)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(panda, get killed)