giant: be in movies slow

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.64
, monster
Weight: 0.62
, company
Weight: 0.61
, team
Weight: 0.56
, brand
Weight: 0.54
Siblings siemens
Weight: 0.59
, boeing
Weight: 0.57
, cyclops
Weight: 0.53
, mitsubishi
Weight: 0.50
, aetna
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in movies slow 1.00
be in movies 0.90
move slowly in movies 0.88
move in movies 0.88
is slow 0.84
move slow 0.80
be thought slow 0.79
be shown really slow 0.79
be shown slow 0.78
be depicted as slow 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(giant, be in movies slow)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(giant, move slowly in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(giant, move slowly in movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(giant, move slowly in movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(giant, is slow)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(giant, is slow)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(giant, is slow)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(giant, be in movies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(giant, move slow)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(giant, be depicted as slow)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(giant, move slowly in movies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(giant, move in movies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(giant, move in movies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(giant, be in movies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(giant, be depicted as slow)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(giant, move slow)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(giant, move slow)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(giant, move in movies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(giant, be depicted as slow)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant, be depicted as slow)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(giant, is slow)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(giant, move slow)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(giant, be in movies)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(giant, move in movies)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(giant, be in movies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(giant, be in movies slow)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(giant, be in movies slow)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(giant, be in movies slow)