giant: fall

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.64
, monster
Weight: 0.62
, company
Weight: 0.61
, team
Weight: 0.56
, brand
Weight: 0.54
Siblings siemens
Weight: 0.59
, boeing
Weight: 0.57
, cyclops
Weight: 0.53
, mitsubishi
Weight: 0.50
, aetna
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
fall 1.00
fall lyrics 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(giant, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(giant, fall)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(giant, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(giant, fall lyrics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(giant, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(giant, fall lyrics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(giant, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(giant, fall lyrics)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(giant, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(giant, fall lyrics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(giant, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(giant, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(giant, fall)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(giant, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(giant, fall)