giant: is new york team

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.64
, monster
Weight: 0.62
, company
Weight: 0.61
, team
Weight: 0.56
, brand
Weight: 0.54
Siblings siemens
Weight: 0.59
, boeing
Weight: 0.57
, cyclops
Weight: 0.53
, mitsubishi
Weight: 0.50
, aetna
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
is new york team 1.00
be called new york 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(giant, is new york team)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(giant, is new york team)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(giant, is new york team)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(giant, be called new york)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(giant, is new york team)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(giant, be called new york)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(giant, is new york team)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(giant, be called new york)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(giant, is new york team)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(giant, be called new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(giant, is new york team)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(giant, is new york team)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(giant, is new york team)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(giant, is new york team)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(giant, is new york team)