giant: is red spot red

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.64
, monster
Weight: 0.62
, company
Weight: 0.61
, team
Weight: 0.56
, brand
Weight: 0.54
Siblings siemens
Weight: 0.59
, boeing
Weight: 0.57
, cyclops
Weight: 0.53
, mitsubishi
Weight: 0.50
, aetna
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
is red spot red 1.00
has color red 0.87
turn yellow 0.81
has color green 0.78
wear blue 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(team, has color red)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(giant, is red spot red)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(team, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(giant, is red spot red)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(monster, has color green)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(giant, is red spot red)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(monster, has color green)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(team, has color red)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(team, wear blue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(monster, has color green)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(team, has color red)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(team, wear blue)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cyclops, has color green)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(team, has color red)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(giant, is red spot red)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(team, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(giant, is red spot red)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(monster, has color green)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(giant, is red spot red)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cyclops, has color green)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cyclops, has color green)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(giant, is red spot red)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(giant, has color red)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(giant, turn yellow)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(giant, turn yellow)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(giant, turn yellow)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(giant, turn yellow)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(giant, has color red)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(giant, has color red)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(giant, has color green)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(giant, has color green)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(giant, has color green)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(giant, has color green)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(giant, wear blue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(giant, wear blue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(giant, has color red)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(giant, wear blue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(giant, wear blue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(giant, is red spot red)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(giant, is red spot red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(monster, has color green)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(team, has color red)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(team, wear blue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cyclops, has color green)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(team, has color red)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(monster, has color green)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(giant, is red spot red)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(team, wear blue)