gift: were left morning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gesture
Weight: 0.69
, blessing
Weight: 0.66
, surprise
Weight: 0.63
, donation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings candy
Weight: 0.69
, kindness
Weight: 0.68
, dinner
Weight: 0.66
, compassion
Weight: 0.66
, free will
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
were left morning 1.00
were left morning after trial kill 0.86
be at night 0.80
be left behind men 0.77
was at finneys 0.77
be left behind all 0.77
help morning sickness 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be at night)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(candy, be left behind men)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(dinner, was at finneys)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(dinner, be at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(dinner, be at night)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(dinner, was at finneys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(dinner, was at finneys)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(candy, be left behind men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(candy, be left behind men)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(gift, were left morning)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(gift, were left morning after trial kill)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(gift, were left morning after trial kill)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(gift, were left morning after trial kill)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(gift, were left morning after trial kill)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(gift, were left morning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(gift, were left morning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(dinner, be at night)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(dinner, was at finneys)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(gift, were left morning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(candy, be left behind men)