gig: has state job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.58
, show
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.48
Siblings concert
Weight: 0.34
, concert hall
Weight: 0.34
, game show
Weight: 0.33
, talk show
Weight: 0.33
, tour
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state job 1.00
has state jobs 0.88
is job sites 0.84
has state last 0.78
is work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(gig, has state job)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(gig, is job sites)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gig, has state jobs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(gig, has state jobs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(gig, is work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(gig, is work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(gig, has state jobs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(gig, is work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(gig, is job sites)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(gig, has state jobs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(gig, is work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(gig, has state last)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(gig, is job sites)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(gig, has state last)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(gig, has state last)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(gig, has state last)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(gig, is job sites)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(gig, has state job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(gig, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(gig, has state job)