gis: be considered enabling technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.52
, tool
Weight: 0.48
, application
Weight: 0.48
, topic
Weight: 0.41
, program
Weight: 0.40
Siblings ajax
Weight: 0.31
, gi
Weight: 0.31
, php
Weight: 0.31
, elisa
Weight: 0.30
, pandora
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered enabling technology 1.00
be considered technology 0.85
is technology 0.84
is powerful technology 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(gis, be considered enabling technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(gis, be considered enabling technology)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(gis, be considered enabling technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(gis, be considered technology)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(gis, be considered enabling technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(gis, is technology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(gis, be considered enabling technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(gis, be considered technology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(gis, be considered enabling technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(gis, be considered technology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(gis, be considered enabling technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(gis, is technology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(gis, be considered enabling technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(gis, is technology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(gis, be considered enabling technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gis, is powerful technology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(gis, be considered enabling technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(gis, be considered technology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(gis, be considered enabling technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(gis, is technology)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(gis, be considered enabling technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(gis, is powerful technology)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(gis, be considered enabling technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(gis, is powerful technology)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(gis, be considered enabling technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(gis, is powerful technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(gis, be considered enabling technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(gis, be considered enabling technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(gis, be considered enabling technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(gis, be considered enabling technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(gis, be considered enabling technology)