gis: has state job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.52
, tool
Weight: 0.48
, application
Weight: 0.48
, topic
Weight: 0.41
, program
Weight: 0.40
Siblings ajax
Weight: 0.31
, gi
Weight: 0.31
, php
Weight: 0.31
, elisa
Weight: 0.30
, pandora
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state job 1.00
has state jobs 0.88
is low salary profession 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(topic, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gis, has state job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(topic, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(topic, has state jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(topic, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(gis, has state job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(gis, has state job)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(gis, has state jobs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(gis, has state jobs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(gis, has state jobs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(gis, is low salary profession)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(gis, has state jobs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(gis, is low salary profession)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(gis, is low salary profession)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gis, is low salary profession)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gis, has state job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gis, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(topic, has state jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(gis, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(topic, has state jobs)