gis: is valuable tool

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.52
, tool
Weight: 0.48
, application
Weight: 0.48
, topic
Weight: 0.41
, program
Weight: 0.40
Siblings ajax
Weight: 0.31
, gi
Weight: 0.31
, php
Weight: 0.31
, elisa
Weight: 0.30
, pandora
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is valuable tool 1.00
has physical part tool 0.89
is valuable 0.88
be valuable tool examining 0.88
be valuable tool for scientist 0.88
is useful 0.85
be valuable tool for environmental scientist 0.83
is powerful technology 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(application, is useful)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(gis, is valuable tool)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(application, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(application, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(application, is useful)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(gis, is valuable tool)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(gis, is valuable tool)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(gis, has physical part tool)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(gis, has physical part tool)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(gis, has physical part tool)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(gis, be valuable tool examining)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(gis, be valuable tool for scientist)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(gis, be valuable tool examining)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gis, be valuable tool for scientist)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(gis, is valuable)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(gis, is useful)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(gis, is useful)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gis, be valuable tool examining)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(gis, be valuable tool for environmental scientist)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gis, be valuable tool for environmental scientist)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(gis, be valuable tool examining)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(gis, is valuable)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(gis, is useful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(gis, be valuable tool for scientist)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(gis, be valuable tool for scientist)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(gis, is valuable)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gis, is valuable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(gis, has physical part tool)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(gis, be valuable tool for environmental scientist)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(gis, be valuable tool for environmental scientist)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(gis, is powerful technology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(gis, is useful)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(gis, is powerful technology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(gis, is powerful technology)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gis, is powerful technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(gis, is valuable tool)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(gis, is valuable tool)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(application, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(gis, is valuable tool)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(application, is useful)