glacier: be example of water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national park
Weight: 0.61
, ice
Weight: 0.58
, park
Weight: 0.58
, world
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grand canyon
Weight: 0.34
, ice cream
Weight: 0.33
, mountain climbing
Weight: 0.33
, death valley
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be example of water 1.00
is water 0.82
be made of water 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ice, be made of water)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(glacier, be example of water)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(ice, is water)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(glacier, be example of water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(ice, is water)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ice, be made of water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ice, is water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(ice, be made of water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(ice, is water)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(glacier, be example of water)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ice, be made of water)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(glacier, be example of water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(glacier, be example of water)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(glacier, is water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(glacier, is water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(glacier, is water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(glacier, be made of water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(glacier, be made of water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(glacier, be made of water)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(glacier, be made of water)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(glacier, is water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(glacier, be example of water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(glacier, be example of water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ice, is water)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ice, be made of water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ice, is water)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(glacier, be example of water)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ice, be made of water)