glacier: erode

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national park
Weight: 0.61
, ice
Weight: 0.58
, park
Weight: 0.58
, world
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grand canyon
Weight: 0.34
, ice cream
Weight: 0.33
, mountain climbing
Weight: 0.33
, death valley
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
erode 1.00
erode environment 0.95
erode land 0.95
erode rock 0.93
erode rocks 0.93
erode mountains 0.90
erode landscape 0.89
erode valleys 0.87
cause erosion 0.78
erode by abrasion 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice, cause erosion)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(glacier, erode)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(glacier, erode)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ice, cause erosion)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(glacier, erode)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(ice, cause erosion)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice, cause erosion)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(glacier, erode)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(glacier, erode)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(glacier, erode)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(glacier, erode)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(glacier, erode)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(glacier, erode land)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(glacier, erode)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(glacier, erode land)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(glacier, erode)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(glacier, erode land)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(glacier, erode)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(glacier, erode valleys)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(glacier, erode)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(glacier, erode valleys)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(glacier, erode)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(glacier, erode)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(glacier, erode)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(glacier, erode)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(glacier, erode)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(glacier, erode)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ice, cause erosion)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(glacier, erode)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ice, cause erosion)