gland: be classified as epithelial tissues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents salivary gland
Weight: 0.87
, body part
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, organ
Weight: 0.52
Siblings adrenal gland
Weight: 0.84
, pineal gland
Weight: 0.82
, sebaceous gland
Weight: 0.75
, mammary gland
Weight: 0.73
, prostate gland
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be classified as epithelial tissues 1.00
be considered epithelial tissue 0.97
is epithelial tissue 0.96
is vascularized 0.78
have considered pancreas liver 0.77
is highly vascularized 0.76
be on anterior 0.76
communicate with cells 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(salivary gland, have considered pancreas liver)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(salivary gland, have considered pancreas liver)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(salivary gland, have considered pancreas liver)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(mammary gland, be on anterior)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(salivary gland, have considered pancreas liver)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(mammary gland, be on anterior)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mammary gland, be on anterior)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(gland, is epithelial tissue)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(gland, be considered epithelial tissue)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(gland, is epithelial tissue)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(gland, is epithelial tissue)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(gland, be considered epithelial tissue)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(gland, be considered epithelial tissue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(gland, be on anterior)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(gland, be on anterior)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(gland, have considered pancreas liver)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(gland, be on anterior)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(gland, communicate with cells)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(gland, have considered pancreas liver)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(gland, communicate with cells)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gland, communicate with cells)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(gland, have considered pancreas liver)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gland, be considered epithelial tissue)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gland, have considered pancreas liver)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(gland, communicate with cells)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(gland, is epithelial tissue)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(gland, be on anterior)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(salivary gland, have considered pancreas liver)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(mammary gland, be on anterior)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(gland, be classified as epithelial tissues)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(salivary gland, have considered pancreas liver)