gland: be larger in females

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents salivary gland
Weight: 0.87
, body part
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, organ
Weight: 0.52
Siblings adrenal gland
Weight: 0.84
, pineal gland
Weight: 0.82
, sebaceous gland
Weight: 0.75
, mammary gland
Weight: 0.73
, prostate gland
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be larger in females 1.00
be present in males 0.84
be much larger in rats 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(salivary gland, be much larger in rats)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(gland, be larger in females)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(salivary gland, be much larger in rats)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(salivary gland, be much larger in rats)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mammary gland, be present in males)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(salivary gland, be much larger in rats)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(gland, be larger in females)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(mammary gland, be present in males)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mammary gland, be present in males)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(gland, be larger in females)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gland, be present in males)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gland, be much larger in rats)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gland, be much larger in rats)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gland, be present in males)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(gland, be present in males)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gland, be much larger in rats)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(gland, be much larger in rats)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(gland, be present in males)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gland, be larger in females)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(gland, be larger in females)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(salivary gland, be much larger in rats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mammary gland, be present in males)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(gland, be larger in females)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(salivary gland, be much larger in rats)