glass: be at milk in refrigerator

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents barrier
Weight: 0.64
, wall
Weight: 0.64
, raw material
Weight: 0.62
, liquid
Weight: 0.61
Siblings glass bottle
Weight: 0.81
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.74
, skylight
Weight: 0.60
, petri dish
Weight: 0.58
, test tube
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at milk in refrigerator 1.00
be at milk in fridge 0.97
be at milk in freezer 0.94
be at milk in kitchen 0.93
be at milk in in kitchen 0.92
be at refrigerator 0.90
be used to hold milk 0.86
be at fridge 0.86
be at milk in your own house 0.86
be at water in kitchen 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wall, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(glass, be at milk in refrigerator)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(wall, be at fridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(glass, be at milk in refrigerator)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wall, be at refrigerator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(wall, be at fridge)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(wall, be at refrigerator)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(wall, be at fridge)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, be used to hold milk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wall, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(glass, be at milk in refrigerator)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(wall, be at fridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(glass, be at milk in refrigerator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(glass bottle, be used to hold milk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(glass bottle, be used to hold milk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(glass, be at milk in refrigerator)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(glass, be at milk in fridge)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(glass, be at milk in kitchen)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(glass, be at milk in fridge)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(glass, be at refrigerator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(glass, be at milk in kitchen)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(glass, be at refrigerator)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(glass, be at milk in fridge)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(glass, be at milk in fridge)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(glass, be at milk in kitchen)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(glass, be at water in kitchen)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(glass, be at refrigerator)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(glass, be at water in kitchen)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(glass, be at refrigerator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(glass, be at milk in kitchen)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(glass, be at water in kitchen)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(glass, be at water in kitchen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(glass, be at milk in refrigerator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(glass, be at milk in refrigerator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wall, be at refrigerator)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wall, be at fridge)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(glass bottle, be used to hold milk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wall, be at refrigerator)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(glass, be at milk in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wall, be at fridge)