glass: be example of transparent material

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents safety glass
Weight: 0.74
, barrier
Weight: 0.64
, wall
Weight: 0.64
, raw material
Weight: 0.62
, liquid
Weight: 0.61
Siblings windshield
Weight: 0.35
, liquid water
Weight: 0.34
, liquid crystal
Weight: 0.34
, aluminum
Weight: 0.34
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be example of transparent material 1.00
is transparent 0.89
be transparent to light 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(glass, be example of transparent material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(liquid water, is transparent)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(glass, be example of transparent material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(liquid water, is transparent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(liquid water, is transparent)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(glass, be example of transparent material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(glass, be example of transparent material)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(glass, be example of transparent material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(glass, is transparent)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(glass, be example of transparent material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(glass, is transparent)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(glass, be example of transparent material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(glass, is transparent)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(glass, be example of transparent material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(glass, be transparent to light)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(glass, be example of transparent material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(glass, be transparent to light)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(glass, be example of transparent material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(glass, is transparent)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(glass, be example of transparent material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(glass, be transparent to light)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(glass, be example of transparent material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(glass, be transparent to light)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(glass, be example of transparent material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(glass, be example of transparent material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(glass, be example of transparent material)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(glass, be example of transparent material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(glass, be example of transparent material)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(glass, be example of transparent material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(liquid water, is transparent)