glaucoma: is thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complication
Weight: 0.67
, disease
Weight: 0.65
, condition
Weight: 0.64
, illness
Weight: 0.57
, contact lens
Weight: 0.57
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.37
, hypertension
Weight: 0.36
, cataract
Weight: 0.36
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.36
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is thing 1.00
is bad thing 0.94
get from one person 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(illness, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(glaucoma, is thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(glaucoma, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(illness, is thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(glaucoma, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(illness, is thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(illness, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(glaucoma, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(glaucoma, is thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(glaucoma, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(glaucoma, is thing)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(glaucoma, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(glaucoma, is bad thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(glaucoma, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(glaucoma, is bad thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(glaucoma, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(glaucoma, is bad thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(glaucoma, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(glaucoma, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(glaucoma, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(glaucoma, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(glaucoma, is thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(glaucoma, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(glaucoma, is thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(glaucoma, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(illness, is thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(glaucoma, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(illness, is thing)