global warming: affect living things

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crisis
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.66
, air pollution
Weight: 0.65
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.65
Siblings nuclear war
Weight: 0.65
, arctic
Weight: 0.51
, carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, computer science
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect living things 1.00
affect things 0.91
affect lives 0.84
affect life 0.84
affect people 0.83
affect inuit people 0.83
go affect 0.82
affect life on earth 0.80
affect tuvalu 0.80
affect house effect 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(air pollution, affect people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(global warming, affect living things)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(technology, affect people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(global warming, affect living things)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(technology, affect people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(global warming, affect living things)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(technology, affect people)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(technology, affect people)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(air pollution, affect people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, affect people)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(technology, affect people)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(technology, affect people)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect life)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect life on earth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(air pollution, affect people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(global warming, affect living things)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(technology, affect people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(global warming, affect living things)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(technology, affect people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(global warming, affect living things)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(overpopulation, affect life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, affect life)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(overpopulation, affect life on earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, affect life on earth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(global warming, affect living things)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect inuit people)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect life on earth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(global warming, affect inuit people)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(global warming, affect life on earth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(global warming, affect inuit people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(global warming, affect people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(global warming, affect life on earth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(global warming, affect life on earth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(global warming, affect people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(global warming, affect people)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(global warming, affect inuit people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect living things)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(global warming, affect living things)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(technology, affect people)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(technology, affect people)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(air pollution, affect people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect life on earth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(technology, affect people)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(technology, affect people)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(global warming, affect living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(air pollution, affect people)