global warming: be bad for humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crisis
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.66
, air pollution
Weight: 0.65
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.65
Siblings nuclear war
Weight: 0.65
, arctic
Weight: 0.51
, carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, computer science
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for humans 1.00
be caused by humans 0.83
be bad for earth 0.81
actually warm up planet 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(global warming, be bad for humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for earth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for earth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(global warming, be bad for humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(global warming, be bad for humans)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(global warming, be bad for earth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(global warming, be bad for earth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be bad for earth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(global warming, be caused by humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(global warming, actually warm up planet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(global warming, actually warm up planet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(global warming, actually warm up planet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(global warming, be bad for earth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(global warming, actually warm up planet)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(global warming, be caused by humans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(global warming, be caused by humans)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be caused by humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be bad for humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(global warming, be bad for humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for earth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(carbon dioxide, be bad for humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(global warming, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for earth)