global warming: be harmful for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crisis
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.66
, air pollution
Weight: 0.65
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.65
Siblings nuclear war
Weight: 0.65
, arctic
Weight: 0.51
, carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, computer science
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful for environment 1.00
be to harmful 0.92
harm earth 0.76
be responsible for climate change 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(global warming, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(global warming, be harmful for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(global warming, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be to harmful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(global warming, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(global warming, harm earth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(global warming, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be responsible for climate change)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(global warming, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(global warming, be to harmful)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(global warming, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(global warming, harm earth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(global warming, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(global warming, harm earth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(global warming, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(global warming, harm earth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(global warming, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(global warming, be responsible for climate change)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(global warming, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(global warming, be to harmful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(global warming, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(global warming, be responsible for climate change)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(global warming, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(global warming, be to harmful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(global warming, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(global warming, be responsible for climate change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(global warming, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(global warming, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be harmful for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(global warming, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(global warming, be harmful for environment)