global warming: be related to people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crisis
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.66
, air pollution
Weight: 0.65
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.65
Siblings nuclear war
Weight: 0.65
, arctic
Weight: 0.51
, carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, computer science
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to people 1.00
be related 0.91
be important to young people 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(technology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(global warming, be related to people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(global warming, be related to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(technology, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be related to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(technology, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(technology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(global warming, be related to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(global warming, be related to people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(global warming, be related to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(global warming, be related to people)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(global warming, be related to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be related)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(global warming, be related to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(global warming, be related)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(global warming, be related to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(global warming, be related)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(global warming, be related to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(global warming, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(global warming, be related to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(global warming, be related to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be related to people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(global warming, be related to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(global warming, be related to people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be related to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(technology, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(global warming, be related to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(technology, be related)