globe: maps flat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents planet
Weight: 0.57
, sphere
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.54
, paper
Weight: 0.54
Siblings earth
Weight: 0.62
, planet earth
Weight: 0.35
, terrestrial planet
Weight: 0.31
, nation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
maps flat 1.00
be better than flat map 0.89
be more useful than flat map 0.88
be more accurate than flat map 0.86
be better than maps 0.86
be more accurate than flat projection map 0.84
be more accurate than maps 0.81
have advantage over maps 0.81
be better than map 0.79
be accurate than map 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(globe, maps flat)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(globe, be better than flat map)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(globe, be better than flat map)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(globe, be better than flat map)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(globe, be better than flat map)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(globe, be more useful than flat map)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(globe, be more useful than flat map)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(globe, be better than maps)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(globe, be more useful than flat map)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(globe, be more accurate than flat map)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(globe, be better than map)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(globe, be more accurate than flat map)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(globe, be more accurate than flat map)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(globe, be accurate than map)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(globe, be more accurate than maps)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(globe, be more useful than flat map)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(globe, have advantage over maps)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(globe, be better than maps)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(globe, be more accurate than flat projection map)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(globe, be better than map)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(globe, be more accurate than flat projection map)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than flat map)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(globe, be more accurate than maps)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(globe, be more accurate than flat projection map)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(globe, be accurate than map)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than flat projection map)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(globe, have advantage over maps)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(globe, be better than maps)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(globe, be better than map)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(globe, be more accurate than maps)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(globe, be accurate than map)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(globe, have advantage over maps)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(globe, be better than maps)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(globe, be better than map)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than maps)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(globe, have advantage over maps)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(globe, be accurate than map)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(globe, maps flat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(globe, maps flat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(globe, maps flat)