gnat: be attracted to cuts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, insect
Weight: 0.51
, bug
Weight: 0.45
, bird
Weight: 0.44
Siblings housefly
Weight: 0.33
, beast
Weight: 0.33
, wasp
Weight: 0.33
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.33
, lizard
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be attracted to cuts 1.00
be attracted to water 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bird, be attracted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gnat, be attracted to cuts)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bug, be attracted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gnat, be attracted to cuts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(bug, be attracted to water)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bird, be attracted to water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(bug, be attracted to water)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(bird, be attracted to water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wasp, be attracted to water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bird, be attracted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(gnat, be attracted to cuts)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bug, be attracted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(gnat, be attracted to cuts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(wasp, be attracted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(wasp, be attracted to water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(gnat, be attracted to cuts)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(gnat, be attracted to water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(gnat, be attracted to water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(gnat, be attracted to water)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(gnat, be attracted to water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gnat, be attracted to cuts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gnat, be attracted to cuts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bug, be attracted to water)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bird, be attracted to water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wasp, be attracted to water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bug, be attracted to water)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(gnat, be attracted to cuts) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bird, be attracted to water)