goat: rub horns

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.72
, horse
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, dog
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cow
Weight: 0.64
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.39
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, llama
Weight: 0.38
, pig
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
rub horns 1.00
use horns 0.88
need horns 0.87
lock horns 0.84
have removed horns 0.84
has physical part horns 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mountain goat, has physical part horns)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part horns)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cow, have removed horns)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mountain goat, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mountain goat, has physical part horns)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(cow, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cow, has physical part horns)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cow, have removed horns)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cow, have removed horns)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(goat, rub horns)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(goat, has physical part horns)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(goat, has physical part horns)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(goat, lock horns)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(goat, lock horns)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(goat, has physical part horns)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(goat, rub horns)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(goat, rub horns)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mountain goat, has physical part horns)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cow, has physical part horns)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(goat, rub horns)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cow, have removed horns)