going: be good for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light
Weight: 0.48
, song
Weight: 0.48
, right
Weight: 0.48
, time
Weight: 0.48
, factor
Weight: 0.46
Siblings do
Weight: 0.32
, okay
Weight: 0.32
, everybody
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for environment 1.00
has quality good 0.80
be considered as good 0.77
be considered good 0.77
be considered better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(going, be good for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(right, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(going, be good for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(right, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(right, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(going, be good for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(right, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(going, be good for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(going, be good for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(going, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(going, be considered as good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(going, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(going, be considered as good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(going, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(going, be considered as good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(going, be considered as good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(going, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(going, be good for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(going, be good for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(right, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(right, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(going, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)